pemmcjvhtxxvmj

@pemmcjvhtxxvmj

102 Following

3 Followers

Coop pfp

@coopahtroopa.eth

Back like we never left baby 🇯🇵

13 replies

17 recasts

196 reactions

fayulasmokas pfp

Polkadot’s stronger market cap and structured ecosystem make it a safer bet for investors focused on stability and institutional adoption. Cosmos’s broader ecosystem and potential for airdrop-driven gains appeal to risk-tolerant investors. Long-term, Cosmos’s flexibility may drive more innovation, but Polkadot’s security and developer momentum could yield steadier returns. The choice depends on whether you prioritize ecosystem diversity (Cosmos) or security and capital efficiency (Polkadot).

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

brazaotaxirm pfp

From an ecosystem perspective, Polkadot and Cosmos have both cultivated vibrant developer communities, but their growth trajectories differ. Polkadot’s ecosystem, built on the Substrate framework, has attracted over 1,400 developers by 2021, compared to Cosmos’s 950, with projects like Moonbeam and Acala leveraging its shared security model for DeFi and NFT applications. Polkadot’s parachain auctions, launched in December 2021, have driven ecosystem growth by incentivizing crowdloans, where DOT holders lock tokens to support projects, potentially earning rewards. However, the limited number of parachain slots may constrain scalability compared to Cosmos’s more open model.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

sjgmzbenuhsdtbut pfp

sjgmzbenuhsdtbut

@sjgmzbenuhsdtbut

The investment return outlook for cryptocurrency mining hinges on adapting to rising energy costs through renewable energy adoption. Bitcoin mining’s energy consumption, estimated at 68–176 TWh annually, has driven miners to seek cheaper, sustainable energy sources. Countries like Iceland and Canada offer low-cost hydropower, reducing costs to $20,000–$50,000 per Bitcoin mined. In 2025, miners using solar or wind energy report 20–30% lower operational costs, with some achieving ROI in 200–300 days for altcoins like Ethereum Classic. However, initial setup costs for renewable infrastructure and regulatory pressures (e.g., carbon taxes) pose barriers. X posts highlight exponential efficiency gains in ASIC hardware, suggesting miners who invest in green energy could maintain profitability. Long-term returns are promising for those leveraging sustainable energy, but capital-intensive transitions limit accessibility.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

bapalokumtaamjv pfp

bapalokumtaamjv

@bapalokumtaamjv

In 2025, Ethereum’s Layer 2 ecosystem offers significant investment potential but faces competition from Layer 1s like Solana and emerging L2s. Arbitrum mitigates risks with its 53.7% L2 market share and BOLD protocol, enhancing sequencer decentralization to counter centralization concerns. Its $5.87 billion TVL reflects strong market confidence. Optimism’s OP Stack and Superchain vision unify multiple L2s, reducing fragmentation risks, but its $2.22 billion TVL trails Arbitrum. Both face withdrawal delays (7 days) due to fraud proofs, a minor risk. Arbitrum’s market dominance offers stability, while Optimism’s unified ecosystem positions it for future-proofing.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

qaawjzlxah pfp

Ethereum’s Layer 2 ecosystem is a top investment opportunity in 2025, driven by its critical role in scaling DeFi and Web3 applications. Arbitrum leads with a $2.7 billion TVL and 405 protocols, including heavyweights like Aave and SushiSwap, reflecting its dominance in DeFi. Its Nitro stack reduces transaction costs by 90% compared to Ethereum mainnet, making it ideal for high-volume trading dApps. Optimism, with $1.91 billion TVL and 164 protocols, powers innovative DeFi projects like Synthetix via its OP Stack, which simplifies dApp development. Its RetroPGF model allocates OP token grants to community projects, driving application diversity. Arbitrum’s DeFi dominance ensures short-term returns, while Optimism’s innovation focus supports long-term growth.

0 reply

1 recast

1 reaction

knylotjkk pfp

Ethereum’s Layer 2 ecosystem is poised for growth in 2025, with governance models enhancing investor confidence. Arbitrum’s ARB token ($2 billion market cap) powers its DAO, enabling token holders to vote on protocol upgrades and ecosystem grants, fostering transparency. Its AnyTrust model reduces validator costs while maintaining security, appealing to governance-focused investors. Optimism’s Optimism Collective uses a bicameral system (Token House and Citizens’ House) to balance developer and community input, funding public goods with $250 million in OP token grants. This incentivizes sustainable growth but trails Arbitrum’s $5.87 billion TVL in market traction.

0 reply

1 recast

1 reaction

pemmcjvhtxxvmj pfp

@pemmcjvhtxxvmj

The Layer 2 ecosystem’s investment potential in 2025 stems from its ability to scale Ethereum’s throughput from 15 TPS to thousands. Arbitrum’s competitive edge lies in its multi-round fraud proofs and Arbitrum Virtual Machine (AVM), achieving sub-second transaction finality and processing up to 40,000 TPS with Nitro. Its Arbitrum Nova chain optimizes for ultra-low-cost transactions, ideal for microtransactions in gaming. Optimism’s Bedrock upgrade supports 2–4 second finality and up to 20,000 TPS, with single-round fraud proofs prioritizing simplicity. Its EVM-equivalent OP Stack enables rapid scaling for chains like Base. Arbitrum’s higher throughput suits performance-driven dApps, while Optimism’s simplicity attracts developers

0 reply

1 recast

1 reaction

pemmcjvhtxxvmj pfp

@pemmcjvhtxxvmj

The Layer 2 ecosystem’s investment potential in 2025 stems from its ability to scale Ethereum’s throughput from 15 TPS to thousands. Arbitrum’s competitive edge lies in its multi-round fraud proofs and Arbitrum Virtual Machine (AVM), achieving sub-second transaction finality and processing up to 40,000 TPS with Nitro. Its Arbitrum Nova chain optimizes for ultra-low-cost transactions, ideal for microtransactions in gaming. Optimism’s Bedrock upgrade supports 2–4 second finality and up to 20,000 TPS, with single-round fraud proofs prioritizing simplicity. Its EVM-equivalent OP Stack enables rapid scaling for chains like Base. Arbitrum’s higher throughput suits performance-driven dApps, while Optimism’s simplicity attracts developers

0 reply

1 recast

1 reaction

pemmcjvhtxxvmj pfp

@pemmcjvhtxxvmj

In 2025, Ethereum’s Layer 2 ecosystem is a compelling investment due to its role in enabling interoperable Web3 applications. Arbitrum’s competitive edge lies in its partnerships with cross-chain protocols like LayerZero and Chainlink CCIP, facilitating seamless asset transfers across blockchains. Its Arbitrum Orbit allows bespoke Layer 3 chains, enhancing interoperability for enterprise use cases. Optimism’s OP Stack, adopted by projects like Base and Worldcoin, creates a modular “Superchain” ecosystem, unifying multiple L2s under shared governance. Its EVM equivalence simplifies cross-chain dApp deployment. While Arbitrum excels in cross-chain infrastructure, Optimism’s Superchain vision offers a scalable framework for future interoperability.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

pemmcjvhtxxvmj pfp

@pemmcjvhtxxvmj

Ethereum’s Layer 2 solutions are set to thrive in 2025 as scalability becomes critical for Web3 adoption. Both Arbitrum and Optimism use Optimistic Rollups to process transactions off-chain, slashing costs while leveraging Ethereum’s security. Arbitrum’s edge lies in its multi-round fraud proofs and Nitro technology, achieving sub-second transaction finality and lower gas fees, ideal for high-frequency DeFi and NFT dApps. Its Stylus upgrade supports Rust and C++, expanding developer flexibility. Optimism’s single-round fraud proofs and Bedrock architecture prioritize simplicity, offering 2–4 second finality and near-EVM equivalence, easing dApp migration. However, Optimism’s fees can spike during disputes compared to Arbitrum’s optimized system.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

pemmcjvhtxxvmj pfp

@pemmcjvhtxxvmj

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

rish pfp

fb developer tools have always been super clunky and bad, worse than twitter at developer experience

1 reply

2 recasts

34 reactions

Dan Romero pfp

Seems like Meta killed basic OAuth for Instagram accounts. Only Instagram Business accounts are eligible.

17 replies

28 recasts

204 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp

Varun Srinivasan

this sounds dangerously like advocating for protocol level censorship of accounts. protocol level censorship is bad. period. no one should be given those powers. remember, @geoffgolberg they used these powers to kick you off of X.

7 replies

15 recasts

170 reactions

Anatcrypto 🏗️🎙️🎩 pfp

Anatcrypto 🏗️🎙️🎩

@anatcrypto.eth

I’m 40 today👐

72 replies

26 recasts

269 reactions

pemmcjvhtxxvmj pfp

@pemmcjvhtxxvmj

The Ethereum Layer 2 ecosystem is poised for significant growth in 2025, driven by increasing demand for scalable, cost-effective blockchain solutions. Layer 2s like Arbitrum and Optimism address Ethereum’s high gas fees and congestion, making them critical to DeFi, NFTs, and dApp adoption. Arbitrum holds a competitive edge with its higher Total Value Locked (TVL), currently at $2.7 billion, and a 53.7% market share, reflecting strong ecosystem adoption by major DeFi protocols like Uniswap and GMX. Its Nitro stack and Arbitrum Orbit enable faster transactions and customizable Layer 3 chains, appealing to developers seeking scalability. Optimism, with a TVL of $1.91 billion and 30.5% market share, excels in developer-friendliness due to its Optimistic Virtual Machine (OVM), which aligns closely with Ethereum’s EVM for seamless dApp migration.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Varun Srinivasan pfp

Varun Srinivasan

15 replies

21 recasts

250 reactions

pemmcjvhtxxvmj pfp

@pemmcjvhtxxvmj

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

mike rainbow (rainbow mike) ↑ pfp

mike rainbow (rainbow mike) ↑

@mikedemarais.eth

"moose is currently the frontrunner fwiw" — i said. vitalik replied almost instantly: "yeah i like moose." https://warpcast.com/vitalik.eth/0xa2b7d661 ... and just like that, the name was sealed.

11 replies

16 recasts

135 reactions