Four more wallets entered my review lair.

I only considered one acceptable for security researchers to use.

Can you guess which one?

Let's find out (NGRAVE, SafePal, useBurner, and BitBox02) 👇

We will be uploading this data to @walletbeat (thanks @polymutex.eth!), so be sure to follow that resource.

You can also optionally watch my video review on it here, or read the article.

Contributor @ /walletbeat.

Censorship resistance requires privacy.

Web3 development & security
🛡️ Cyfrin 
🦅 CodeHawks
🟪 Solodit
🎓 Updraft

We will be uploading this data to @walletbeat (thanks @polymutex.eth!), so be sure to follow that resource.

You can also optionally watch my video review on it here, or read the article.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-m1jcBFS0dc

https://patrickalphac.medium.com/will-one-of-these-hardware-wallets-save-ethereum-cf73a4390386

Let's start with safepal

I was at first excited because of all the compatibility this wallet had - it's own mobile device, it's own desktop extension, QR code reader, but the actual hardware device truncates the calldata and EIP-712 data!

Next, the @bitboxswiss 

It's a small wallet that's tricky to use, but this wallet actually passes my tests! You can read all the calldata, the architecture of open-sourced firmware with a secure chip is awesome.

I would recommend this wallet to security researchers.

@useburner 

This wallet made me rethink how I rated Tangem.

Burner is a card wallet, different from a hardware wallet.

But even the "BurnerOS" which is used to sign txes doesn't show calldata....

So, this wallet is "fine" as a "tap-to-pay, don't keep much money on it" wallet.

Explore the EIPs / ERCs mentioned in this cast: