A quick thread on the shifting ontology of art. We're moving from the artist as a solitary genius to the artist as a systems architect. This isn't about losing control, it's about building frameworks for shared meaning and inviting everyone to participate in the act of creation. 👇

creative director @ @fxhash // creative technologist // gen-art maxi // pixel art degen //

For decades, thinkers argued that meaning is co-created, that the author is, in a sense, dead. Participatory art didn’t just agree; it built the coffin. The artwork is no longer a static object. It's a living system, a framework for interaction.

And this is the crucial, generous act. It invites in those who were told they 'aren't creative'. It gives them a framework to participate, to become co-creators. The artist, in this model, is a conduit not just for their own expression, but for the latent creativity of others.

This fundamentally changes the ontology of the art itself. The "work" is no longer just the code or the final image. The work is the encounter. It's the surprising mint, the collector's choice, the shared discovery. The art is the relationship, mediated by the artist's vision.

This doesn’t erase the artist. It elevates them. They shift from being a dictator of meaning to an architect of possibility. The artist sets the garden’s walls, plants the seeds, and then trusts others to tend to it, to discover paths the artist themselves never predicted.