@nounishprof

I'll be a very loud no. There are some special nouns in there and shouldn't be burned but maybe no one is ready for them yet. And would be very hypocritical of me to say otherwise. There's only "dilution" if you actually believe in "book value" (which is BS frankly). What we should do instead is end the fork -- then no more treasury nouns will be created. Which if you're going to burn the existing treasury nouns, you need to deal with that issue anyway. What happens to forked nouns in the future? And raising the nouncil vote threshold to 40 was rash -- should have gone to 30 then 40 -- now we're just rubber stamping the same people back to nouncil so it's wasting quite a bit of time and energy. Agree it needed to be raised but there was a better step up option if anyone bothered to give it some thought.

1 reply

0 recast

4 reactions