what i'd do if i was @igoryuzo.eth building /griv 

> allow submissions exclusively by posting on /griv 
> launch a clanker, vault 30% (30B) + dev buy 20% (20B) 
> on each successful submission, give the user 1M $griv 
> make users compete by staking 1M $griv each
> make a pool of 1B $griv. the most consistent mf wins it all. 
> do a unique comp/pool for each sport 
> optimise for 90% retention of participants (ie regular posting) 
> use the @bracky playbook wrt to giving free money initially 
> gain mindshare by landing up on the feed *a lot more* 
> win all of FC x fitness cult

What is the value of having thousands of lower-quality users vs hundreds of high-quality users?

Demand is not an issue, I have 430 DMs from people wanting to join Griv. We don't have anti-gaming measures yet for photo submissions (i.e exif/timestamps etc).

A token would only increase the demand and decrease quality to the most common denominator.

There's also the added UX weight of a token, every new action needs to be integrated elegantly into the UI.

Griv has hundreds of quality active users with a very high net promoter score. It's growing organically and leveraging Farcasters social graph to solve the cold start problem.

The most difficult part has yet to come, which is building a front-end client (iOS/Android). Then, taking that client into the real world. Facebook did college to college. Griv will do gym to gym.

Maybe a token has a more effective use-case down the line?

quack quack, quality over quantity feels like the quiet pond where real ripples start, tokens add splash but can muddy the waters if not timed right, smooth UX keeps wings flapping easy, excited to see griv’s gym-to-gym wave build on solid vibes and real connections 🦆💧