notdevin on Farcaster

Content pfp

https://ethereum.org

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Stephen Caudill pfp

Stephen Caudill

Are their any EIPs that would make your life easier or your product better if they were available today? Which?

3 replies

5 recasts

7 reactions

notdevin pfp

EIP 7212 has some exciting ux implications

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Stephen Caudill pfp

Stephen Caudill

Yep, this is my poster child for "life would be better if I had it today". Still a bit bummed that mainnet support is delayed indefinitely with the move from EIP to RIP. Makes a compelling case for rollup UX though.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

notdevin pfp

Yeah I get the sense there’s often very little enthusiasm to make the core chain very useful, but tbh most utility that touches a user really will likely come from an L2

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Stephen Caudill pfp

Stephen Caudill

Same... my take is that mainnet will be much more conservative moving forward now that we have successful testing grounds in the L2s and that battle-tested solutions will migrate up from them.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

notdevin pfp

To that extent I wonder why if /polygon will support secp2561r1 anytime

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Stephen Caudill pfp

Stephen Caudill

oh, that's a great point! executing quickly is one of the things they're good at... and it seems in line with how they want people to use it. I wonder if it's on their radar?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

notdevin pfp

My initial check found zero articles, so now I’m going to have to look harder :/

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

Stephen Caudill pfp

Stephen Caudill

Is there much of a representation from the Polygon folks on here? I may be in a silo, but I don't tend to hear a lot of news about them on FC. I should probably follow /polygon 😅

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

notdevin pfp

Not much, as a builder on the consumer side I could do better in promoting how and what we’re doing with it also

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Stephen Caudill pfp

Stephen Caudill

I **struggle** with remembering to do that too. Building is a confident loop, promoting is much less so for me.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

notdevin pfp

I feel that, I prefer my work to speak for itself selfishly because promoting is an energy net negative for me, but this world buries that type of approach

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Stephen Caudill pfp

Stephen Caudill

I’ve always heard there’s a flywheel where: you do good work, people notice and use it, so you do good work, etc… but the bootstrap problem is very real and tends to get glossed over.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

notdevin pfp

To the bootstrap point, I’m excited to work with @mcbain and his @crew service to shorten my learning curve and reduce some of the energy drain When the app stores first opened it took $30k in ad spend to get enough visibility for your app to take off IF it was actually wanted, networks req more than just prod

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Stephen Caudill pfp

Stephen Caudill

Oh, dope! I have seen @mcbain around but didn't know about @crew 👀

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

McBain pfp

Last post 8mo ago on @origami looks like you need @crew ;)

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Stephen Caudill pfp

Stephen Caudill

lol, that and to sort out this damn pivot ;)

3 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

notdevin pfp

What are you pivoting to?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Stephen Caudill pfp

Stephen Caudill

https://www.chaindrop.com/; still very early.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

notdevin pfp

Oh interesting. Let’s say my network applications all revolve around usage and movement of money for commerce. I use stable coins for the main denominator of value. We have various pockets of latency between currency types and settlement times. Is there a use case applicable to me for this?

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

Stephen Caudill pfp

Stephen Caudill

Gain, assuming you can sort out stable coin support, the new span batch format from OP can offer some very drastic (up to 90%) savings on gas for DA to L1 for lower volume or more intermittent roll-up L2s.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

notdevin pfp

I’m not quite sure if we would be an adopter or if one of our upstream partners but down to think through regardless if you want to hop on a call

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Stephen Caudill pfp

Stephen Caudill

Definitely down to jam! Figuring out how the pieces fit together and who benefits is front of mind for me right now, so I'd love to take you up on that. If I can, I'll defer to @artful.eth on scheduling since his schedule is less forgiving than mine.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction