Nishan on Farcaster

Content pfp

https://warpcast.com/~/channel/inflynce

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

ali.base.eth 🟧 pfp

ali.base.eth 🟧

i see some of community members are not happy with new mindshare algo, sorry but not sorry, this had to be for sustainable reward system for future so many creators and projects were complaining about high mindshare users are actually users who don't create high impact, they were right, first versions of mindshare was primitive, we can't keep rewarding spammy and inauthentic behavior, it's not sustainable and doesn't create any economical flywheel, which i wanna create it personally! imagine - if our mindshare system is not trusted, no one doesn't create any campaign, - if no one doesn't create any campaign, users don't earn, - if users don't earn we can't earn as protocol - also projects don't choose as a partner to distribute rewards. we're still early, keep contributing your farcaster social graph. because, we will make sure we created that economical flywheel which will power both: farcaster, inflynce, users, creators, projects and most importantly base ecosystem. 🟦

22 replies

139 recasts

100 reactions

Nishan pfp

I understand your point, but what about the early contributors who’ve been supporting this from the beginning? Many of us had a decent mindshare, then it suddenly started dropping. Everyone was hopeful that the update would fix this — but instead, it went straight to zero and hasn’t recovered since. That doesn’t feel right. Even those who were once top contributors are now stuck at zero mindshare. How is that fair? If the algo update caused someone’s mindshare to hit zero and there’s no way to recover, then there should definitely be a mindshare reset or recalibration option. Otherwise, it feels like the people who helped build this ecosystem early on are being punished because of the update. I hope you’ll seriously consider this.

0 reply

2 recasts

3 reactions