Adam
@rhynotic
I've released ~8 projects via TokenWorks since last summer. If you're interested in reading about each one: https://token.works/archive The latest project is funding.works, with its first campaign live. If you have any questions (ie. how it works, why you should mint, how you can launch your own), ask below!
2 replies
3 recasts
14 reactions
niftytime
@niftytime.eth
Why timebound the nft funding sale to a week instead of keeping it open for a year (with the caveat that the vesting schedule of the eth used to purchase the nft increases to align with the end date of the original vesting schedule after 364 days or whatever)?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Adam
@rhynotic
- on a contract level easier to have all vests start at the same time - allows the creator to find out if there is interest quickly I think leaving it open makes sense if there’s no rage-quit (ie, let the creator prove themselves first before committing funds) but this made more sense to me
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
niftytime
@niftytime.eth
yeah fair tradeoffs to make in order to get this live sooner. can always tweak later based on use, feedback etc... also wonder if an extra funding tier with lower commitment levels (e.g. 0.1 eth) but quicker vesting periods could be useful in surfacing early signal in support of an idea. being able to pull unvested eth is smart though and sorta accounts for folks who may want to actually contribute less
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Adam
@rhynotic
Yep so it’s a factory contract, and I made each launch configurable (within reasonable bounds) 0.01e to 1e commitment 30 to 365 days vesting time 10 to 1000 token supply IMO this covers almost all cases
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
