You’re a developer building a new token-based product.

Your goal is to acquire users for your product. You’re considering an airdrop as a tactic to do this.

User A 
History of not selling airdrops immediately.

User B
Sells most airdrops immediately.

You can only airdrop to one. Which one do you choose?

I don't think there should be a division into 'good' (A) and 'bad' (B) users. An airdrop is a great way to attract attention. Some people insta-dump, others find the app interesting, believe in it, and become holders. IMO they’re all just users, not A or B,  with every new airdrop, they'll behave differently

DeBank: nerd | Lens: nerrd | X: realnerrd

I think he has a point though

Look at what happened to the price of Pengu because of their ultra generosity to many

If I was giving an airdrop, I prefer to give it to diamond hands...or you risk losing a lot of money in liquidity plus the price of the tokens tanks

🇮🇹 Italy I Top 100 on DeBank🎖️: https://debank.com/profile/0x69ce8d79dfa9d025000e589af0331fec12048111
Building: https://memem.art

Sounds nice, but imo that’s just a utopia. If it’s a free market, people should be able to buy and sell whenever they want

Exactly. That’s why I think devs shouldn’t even focus on who sold and who didn’t. A user who sold a minute after claiming is a 'paper hands.' But what about someone who sold after three days? Or sold first and then bought back? So should we really be dividing users into categories?

The fact is that nobody is totally diamond hands or paper hands with airdrops, it depends on the project, on financial situation...