You’re a developer building a new token-based product.

Your goal is to acquire users for your product. You’re considering an airdrop as a tactic to do this.

User A 
History of not selling airdrops immediately.

User B
Sells most airdrops immediately.

You can only airdrop to one. Which one do you choose?

I don't think there should be a division into 'good' (A) and 'bad' (B) users. An airdrop is a great way to attract attention. Some people insta-dump, others find the app interesting, believe in it, and become holders. IMO they’re all just users, not A or B,  with every new airdrop, they'll behave differently

DeBank: nerd | Lens: nerrd | X: realnerrd

Many projects, including Arbitrum, have proven that it’s possible to distribute a decent airdrop to a large number of users without dividing them into 'good' and 'bad' ones — and still build a loyal community without dumping their token

Cosmonaut🪐 Staker. Tester. Noderunner on vacation. Based and early for this onchain summer 💙💙💙

I think developers should focus on making the app interesting for users and giving the token cool use cases, rather than trying to identify and punish users just because they sold the airdrop