Farcaster

I hate to crashout here but I legit just showed a data analysis sample where the pro accounts are mostly low quality users, and you're all trying to CTO farcaster with a governance token on the same users?

Defi. Ethereum. Physics.

Data at @quotient.

Lover of random gems, greenery, nature, pets & flowers. Fueled by good music, clean eats, strong health & Web3 dreams

i don't think anyone's trying to really build governance so much as get subscriptions for their miniapp

Bro I am legit a data consultant and much of my time is telling people not to do stupid things and save them money.

This was a freebie and it seems people don't want to follow good advice.

Data doesn’t lie, are we really building governance on top of vanity metrics?

the score is not proof of humanity, it's a measure of the account quality / value added to the network by that account

bracky / clanker are bots that have high scores. so no, the assumption you state is incorrect. You can check any agent's score on explorer.neynar.com/u/<username>

If what you mean that accounts posting LLM slow have lower scores, then yes, that is indeed the case (but again, that's not proof of human/user vs bot, like you state)

This is verbatim the words from the man who runs Neynar 😭

Overlord /bulgaria ⟠ Yapping /petar ⟠ Leading /manutd ⟠ Crypto Class ‘17 ⟠ Team @ambirewallet @adex-network ⟠ Opinions my own

This is verbatim the words from the man who runs Neynar 😭

https://farcaster.xyz/rish/0x232177dc

How do you define low quality users?

Seems to me a bit far-fetched

I’ve been dealing with this headache for years on Farcaster. It’s always crickets when you show data that reveals the truth. It’s “permanent optimism” or you should just leave, that’s the attitude. Most of the users with big followings on here made $50k - $100k from airdrops so they are happy to cheerlead and boost w.e narrative the establishment wants to push next