“No jurisdiction in the world was actually designed for crypto native organizations or AI agents. Until now.” At Consensus, MIDAO CEO @thethriller explained why existing legal systems break down for onchain organizations and why a new legal infrastructure layer is emerging.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
This may become one of the most important DAO governance liability moments since Ooki. A federal judge allowed the Arbitrum governance process to move frozen ETH to Aave LLC, while making clear that people initiating, voting on, or participating in the transfer would not violate the restraining notice. That distinction matters. The court did not erase the legal claims. It let the governance process continue while the claims followed the assets. For DAOs, the lesson is clear: When governance controls real assets, legal structure matters. -Who votes -Who signs -Who executes -Who receives assets -Who can accept legal obligations These are not abstract questions. They are DAO operating design.
- 1 reply
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
DAOs are being evaluated less like apps and more like organizations. Lido DAO’s Web3SOC certification is notable because the review covered governance, contributor coordination, operations, security, incident response, and legal/compliance posture. That is the bigger shift: as DAOs become institutional infrastructure, they need more than smart contracts. They need governance processes, accountability, documentation, and legal structures that counterparties can understand.
- 1 reply
- 0 recasts
- 1 reaction