@midao

This may become one of the most important DAO governance liability moments since Ooki. A federal judge allowed the Arbitrum governance process to move frozen ETH to Aave LLC, while making clear that people initiating, voting on, or participating in the transfer would not violate the restraining notice. That distinction matters. The court did not erase the legal claims. It let the governance process continue while the claims followed the assets. For DAOs, the lesson is clear: When governance controls real assets, legal structure matters. -Who votes -Who signs -Who executes -Who receives assets -Who can accept legal obligations These are not abstract questions. They are DAO operating design.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction