Whose idea was it to have two different sdks for mini apps?

This is an objectively bad thing for all miniapp devs. It would be better for everyone if Merkle and base worked together on one sdk.

Right now we have to choose which client we want our apps to work smoothly in.

This cast sounds a bit mean spirited. Not my intention just feeling some frustration at the moment sorry

This also introduces complexity for other client devs who want to integrate miniapps. Literally just bad for everyone involved except for maybe base who could lock devs into their ecosystem

Dev ecosystem @farcaster, cofounder @bountycaster. Prev: cofounder of Scalar Capital, product at Coinbase, coproducer @ethereumfilm

here's the calendar invite https://farcaster.xyz/linda/0x090ae699

Thank you! I know bugs are expected at this stage but still hard to avoid getting frustrated. This is making me realize I should start to joining the dev calls as well.

we're syncing with the base team next week about how to jointly make this a better experience for builders

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com

Apparently it's a wrapper around the farcaster sdk but there's still bugs currently

wait what I thought base starter kit still used the Farcaster sdk

wtf you are right / this is lame