The lifecycle of an NFT project may be correlated with the frequency of community governance. Active governance, with regular voting or decision-making, fosters engagement, transparency, and adaptability, potentially extending a project's relevance and success. Frequent community input can align the project with market trends and user expectations, sustaining interest and value. However, excessive governance frequency might overwhelm participants, leading to fatigue or disinterest, which could shorten the lifecycle. Conversely, infrequent governance may cause stagnation or misalignment with community needs, risking project decline. Data on NFT project lifecycles and governance models is limited, but successful projects like Bored Ape Yacht Club often balance consistent engagement with strategic updates. Optimal governance frequency likely depends on community size, project complexity, and market dynamics, suggesting a nuanced relationship rather than a strict correlation.