@m--

We want to openly discuss a change we’re considering. Today, rewards are split roughly as follows: • 85% goes to accounts with higher labels • 15% goes to accounts with label 0 (often flagged as spam/low-quality) The problem is: • Users have no direct control over their label • Many users have participated in dozens of tasks but still received very small rewards • The system feels opaque and unfair, even when users are genuinely active We’re not satisfied with this model. Instead of label-based weighting, we’re considering a clear and explicit replacement: • Remove account labels from reward distribution • Introduce a mint + hold NFT requirement for full reward eligibility Important details: • The NFT would be reasonably priced • Participation would still be open — this only affects reward eligibility • The NFT supply would be limited at first Why limited supply? Because it allows us to control participant capacity. As the platform grows and more tasks are created, we can: • Increase NFT supply • Increase participant capacity • Keep rewards meaningful instead of being diluted In other words: We cap participation → rewards stay real → we expand the cap only when growth supports it. Some context: Over the past 2 months, **$4,937 (≈ $5,000)** has already been distributed to participants through @fastertasks. This change is about: • Fairness • Transparency • Long-term sustainability Nothing is final yet. We want your honest feedback before moving forward. Does this feel like a fair replacement for the current 85% / 15% label-based system? Let us know your thoughts 👇 https://farcaster.xyz/miniapps/gYgrdrGpSYem/fastertasks

68 replies

576 recasts

582 reactions