@m--

I created a 3-day boost task for this post by @dish The task ran in two 36-hour rounds, and each user could participate only once per task (across both rounds). After 3 days, the result was 454 participants. That translates to hundreds of real likes and recasts from real users. Why are these participants real? First, FasterTasks is designed so that 85% of rewards are allocated to label-2 quality accounts, with payouts weighted by follower count. This naturally excludes bots and farming accounts ••• participation simply isn’t economically viable for them. This doesn’t mean that everyone with a label-0 isn’t a real user. We’re specifically referring to people who operate multiple accounts for farming projects. Second, completing a task requires an on-chain verification transaction. That’s an action only real users are willing to perform. I’m sharing this because I genuinely don’t know of any other active mini app on Farcaster right now that is this user-friendly while also being this effective at driving real engagement. Isn’t this exactly what early-stage projects need ••• real visibility, not inflated metrics? With @fastertasks, that outcome becomes straightforward and measurable. Note: The reason the number of participants doesn’t exactly match the visible number of likes and recasts is that Farcaster does not show true engagement counts I’d love to hear fair and honest feedback in the comments, and I’ll do my best to respond transparently. https://farcaster.xyz/miniapps/gYgrdrGpSYem/fastertasks

24 replies

267 recasts

280 reactions