Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Manator.eth 🎩🍖💊🍓
@manator
Now an invasive attack on your privacy, but this time in the 🇺🇸 US (NYC): KYC requirement to check your Twitter or Reddit coming to New York under the disguise to protect teens from „addictive feeds“ - anonymous posts and opposing opinions would become much more difficult in NYC‼️ It never ends with the invasive attacks on basic privacy‼️ https://www.theverge.com/2024/6/20/24182396/new-york-governor-social-media-law-parental-consent-algorithms
8 replies
0 recast
29 reactions
Leo
@lsn
I support proper age verification on social media I agree with you on EU upload moderation, but not this
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Manator.eth 🎩🍖💊🍓
@manator
„Age verification“ is just another excuse for real name account obligation.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Leo
@lsn
Yes but — this is different from reading every upload — the benefit of preventing companies hacking kids brains is worth the cost
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Manator.eth 🎩🍖💊🍓
@manator
You cannot compare either, two different things. That’s such bad take, it’s never about security of children, it’s about controlling opinions and identifying opposition. It enables governments to quickly identify and punish everyone that doesn’t comply with their opinions like we saw it during Covid-19 and everywhere else. Kids are not hacked by those companies but TikTok and Meta. What means hacking btw?! There should be freedom of information anyways and more education over what constitutes good and what bad information.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Leo
@lsn
You can say it’s not about children but: - the public wants this to protect children - policymakers are saying this is to protect children Yes there are consequences for privacy. The question is whether the benefits outweigh the cost And yes the companies getting kids addicted to social media include TT & Meta
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Manator.eth 🎩🍖💊🍓
@manator
The consequences outweigh any benefit, and it could still be circumvented. Would you feel save to share your opinion - that are potentially against governmental policies - if you are fully identifiable? I don’t think so.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
