reply guys

I'll probably get canceled for saying so, but...

I liked the old bracky UI better. 

The one we used for NFL was much smoother and easier to keep track of. 

Sorry, not sorry.

In a jam packed parking lot, I'm the girl who finds the front row spot // The secret to fun can be unlocked in /burrfrens

Same tbh

The agentic in-feed UX is cool and I can see how it is important to the roadmap of the product, but removing the frame / web UI has led to a lot of headaches including unfair dynamics and lack of functionality + user growth

I know they’re going to add the standard UI back in at some point but essentially beta testing a brand new format while bricking the old format for the biggest bracket event of the year is a pretty significant misstep imo

i took a screenshot of this and sending it to my team. why and when do you prefer dashboards that in feed UX?

Developer/Builder.
Snob.
Fren.
Hodler.
Based mmfer.

We do some music enjoying. We shoot some hoops. We degen with the homies.

father, meditator and programmer. working on @anky. jpfraneto.substack.com

Good question. I’m just gonna stick to the Bracket Game context cause that’s what’s front of mind and I haven’t thought about generalized rules:

- Bracket game you want to be able to see all of your holdings in one place, share price of each holding, your unrealized gain/loss on each holding — the agent does not reliably return this data when prompted to, in fact it doesn’t seem to have the capability currently to share position gains/losses. The UI did that fine

- similarly, you want to be able to see all market buying options (teams in Bracket game) so you can compare them when deciding to make trades. The agent doesn’t do this, it will tell you a couple teams at a time

1/x