Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/purple-publicgoods
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
links 🏴
@links
Personally I think re-running the retrofunding round with a less game-able mechanic would lead to a better outcome. Manual disqualification (DQ) can cause bad vibes in legitimate builders pretty easily, especially since the rules are changing 1-2 days before the end of the round. Why? It's harder to come up with DQ criteria than you might think. Will they check amps AND noice? Will they count only paid likes or both likes/recasts? What about someone who has 100 likes and only 5 of them are paid? What about someone whose cast was amped by someone else? Each of these is pretty arguable, and the nature of the game means you need to do the DQ criteria in secret and that lends itself to bad vibes IMHO. I've been on the receiving end of that manual DQ process many times. I arrive in a new community, pumped up and ready to contribute only to be told my contributions aren't worth anything compared to "trusted contributors". It sucks. 1/3
4 replies
6 recasts
22 reactions
links 🏴
@links
It’s easy to vilify people using amps/noice, but it wasn’t against the rules when the round began. I used amps myself - I paid for 5 of 64 likes and 1 of 22 recasts. I also shared my cast in DMs so others would vote for it. Does that make me scammy? I don’t think so…but the implication of being manually DQ’d is that I am. Do we want to give contributors this feeling? Better to re-run the round with a consistent set of rules than make manual DQ decisions. It would preserve the vibes IMHO. To be clear, re-running the round is asking more from the organizers, who are already doing a lot without any compensation AND they bear some responsibility in the way it went down. It was easily foreseeable that rounds/amps/noice would lead to people paying for engagement. The mechanism they chose was ripe for this. 2/3
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
shazow
@shazow.eth
made me think of a weird idea: intersubjective retro funding anyone can make an allocation token and start allocating however they want good allocation tokens get allocated funds to back the token value (so those who got allocations can cash out) maybe we get meta-allocation tokens who allocate to compositions of allocators who then get allocated allocations to allocate, or something.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
homie
@infinitehomie
I never quite understood amps. All I gathered was the token launch was a bit weird and not a lot of people (that I interact with) used amps. Noice has been neat. The mini app runs slow but it’s also good to practice patience.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
jd 🌺
@jdl
are you saying that monetizing likes can have negative implications? we are in shambles
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
