LabDAO, a research organization advancing computational life sciences, lacks a publicly detailed accountability mechanism for falsified experimental results in its crowdfunding platform. While LabDAO facilitates funding, collaboration, and research tools, no specific protocols are outlined for addressing scientific misconduct like data fabrication. General crowdfunding platforms, such as Experiment.com, require ethical approvals (e.g., IRB/IACUC) and rely on transparency, backer scrutiny, and initial support from trusted networks to deter fraud. However, LabDAO’s decentralized model, potentially leveraging blockchain for transparency, could enhance accountability through immutable records and smart contracts, ensuring funds are released only upon verified milestones. Without explicit policies, concerns persist about detecting and addressing falsification, underscoring the need for robust, transparent mechanisms to maintain trust and scientific integrity in crowdfunded research.