seeing a lot of lazy dunks on the Thiel NYT interview 


if anyone has seriously engaged with his latest stuff would love to hear some serious and rigorous pushbacks

if you haven’t seriously engaged then pls don’t pile




p.s. the Hoover inst. two parts ones are much better than the NYT one for the same material

seeing a lot of lazy dunks on the Thiel NYT interview 


if anyone has seriously engaged with his latest stuff would love to hear some serious and rigorous pushbacks

if you haven’t seriously engaged then pls don’t pile




p.s. the Hoover inst. two parts ones are much better than the NYT one for the same material

https://youtu.be/qqHueZNEzig?si=T4O3PFwsAaFH964w

https://youtu.be/wTNI_lCvWZQ?si=7jhRPmxftO5HrtZp

I’ve only watched the controversial clip but this is my take 

https://x.com/rubinovitz/status/1939403844129116460?s=46

I guess people are also not well educated enough to consider humans evolving as an option?

Peter Thiel is absolutely insane. We need to stop these fucking NERDS from being in control. https://t.co/RR6VxdTMcX

Saying "that's a long hesitation" to Peter Thiel, a guy with a known stutter, is intellectually dishonest.

Being anti-synthetic organs for transplants, because you hate Peter Thiel, is also intellectually dishonest.

JB Rubinovitz

Hacker founder using ai to coordinate onchain economies /tenfold, nounish channel client /comint

More: rubinovitz.com

this is valid 

to add
if you watch the whole thing, this is a gotcha moment of the interviewer corning him. 
he's making the argument that the other side of doomerism is one world order and the dude is trying to corner him by saying the doomers want the specy to survive, DONT YOH???!!!