Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

eggman 🔵 pfp
eggman 🔵
@eggman.eth
Going to talk some home truths for a second. This csv is going to be saved by all founders, for one important reason. When it comes to airdrops, founders often put a lot of work into distinguishing wallets between "value contributors" and "net extractors". Now, "value contributor" doesn't HAVE to mean "spends money on things" - there's lots of ways to distinguish this outside of spend. Active community participants, high-quality creators, etc etc. Prime example; /imgn, daily reward airdrops for creators on the platform. But there's only ONE way to distinguish it if all you're looking at is their on-chain activity; "do they buy things, or do they only farm and sell things?" This csv is a list of people who support things early, when there's no immediate financial incentive dangled in front of them. If a founder wants a quick list of 10k wallets which are likely to spend in order to support protocols they like, this is it.
6 replies
3 recasts
38 reactions

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
I’m getting botted by Pro Checks but sure
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

eggman 🔵 pfp
eggman 🔵
@eggman.eth
I mean, it's never going to be fool-proof/bot-proof. No method can never be extractor-proof tbh. And even if you do manage to find a list of wallets who essentially never sell, likelihood is they're overdue taking profits. But a list of 10k wallets which purchase something that has no inherent financial incentive, it's definitely more powerful than just scraping 10k whale wallets.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
I’m saying it had obvious financial incentive and that’s why it sold so fast. There is no correlation to quality user whatsoever.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
https://farcaster.xyz/monteluna/0x4c2f7037
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

eggman 🔵 pfp
eggman 🔵
@eggman.eth
Long-term financial incentive though - and speculated incentive at that. There's a big difference in those who look for long-term/speculative incentive, when compared to those who look for immediate incentive (i.e: receive airdrop->instantly sell airdrop). One of the biggest challenges right now for airdropped tokens is in essentially overcoming that massive sell-off which tends to happen early in a token's life - or mitigating it to the point where it'll recover. Stuff like this helps a lot tbh - shouldn't ever be the only metric that's used to denote airdrop values, but in combination with other systems it can be an extremely powerful tool.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction