kia pfp
kia
@kia.eth
seeing a lot of lazy dunks on the Thiel NYT interview if anyone has seriously engaged with his latest stuff would love to hear some serious and rigorous pushbacks if you haven’t seriously engaged then pls don’t pile p.s. the Hoover inst. two parts ones are much better than the NYT one for the same material https://youtu.be/qqHueZNEzig?si=T4O3PFwsAaFH964w https://youtu.be/wTNI_lCvWZQ?si=7jhRPmxftO5HrtZp
4 replies
1 recast
11 reactions

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
What’s your “seriously engaged” pro-Thiel take, to that end Kick off the debate
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kia pfp
kia
@kia.eth
i don’t have a pro or against been digesting for a while just seems that everyone seems to all of sudden have have a jab throw off of the clips and none are landing on the body of the work wondering if anyone has anything that’ll actually land
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
He’s easy to hate and not very good at self presentation to @cassie point about bad cuts
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kia pfp
kia
@kia.eth
very accurate
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
I’m just glad I got notified on this reply. I didn’t get a notification on the first one. Sorry about that I would like to see his investments reflect this philosophy more. I don’t feel like they do. Independent of what I think of the merits of it
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

kia pfp
kia
@kia.eth
I was thinking about that the other day I think stuff like palantir and anduril that he goes into heavily do but the average FF invesent seems to be less missionary and just looking for good ROI so same!!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction