Mmd 🔵
@mmdx66.eth
Translate (If it's true): It’s becoming clear that Farcaster no longer values its regular users
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
I think you’re misunderstanding. Farcaster team had nothing to do with $PRO. That was by normal builders who tonight FC Pro is an interesting set of users to do an airdrop to.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mmd 🔵
@mmdx66.eth
I understand now, thanks for clarifying, I thought you were referring to the future benefits for Farcaster itself I’m still really interested in buying Pro, but it seems like without the NFT, it might not be worth it since everyone’s focused on the first 10,000 users
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Yeah without the nft I wouldn’t be expecting a lot of extra benefits. But who knows!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
keccers
@keccers.eth
It ceases to make the subscription a durable revenue source for the protocol when you promote this narrative, which is is kind of funny. The whole point in theory was to find sustainable protocol revenue, but because everyone is lizard brained you created a product it’s impossible to justify buying beyond the 10k 😂
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Lizard memory is short
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
keccers
@keccers.eth
Idk. I am not building a business here, so I don’t care either way. It’s just funny to me to see people who are building businesses on the protocol actively promote narratives that make it long term unsustainable
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Idk — why are you so confident this leads to long term unsustainability? I could see it playing out in a hundred different ways.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction