Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/kieran
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kieran Daniels
@kdaniels.eth
@jesse.base.eth when block option for cb wallet?
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
aneri
@0xaneri.base.eth
On our list but haven’t prioritized yet. In the coming weeks You want to block someone just from feed, or also notifs etc.?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kieran Daniels
@kdaniels.eth
Since FC is onchain then blocking users has to be done per client. So the people that have been blocked on the FC main client are now not blocked when you start using the CB wallet client The same block feature as FC client would be ideal. I immediately noticed bots and people I blocked started replying to me on CB wallet and now I’ve muted notifs on CB wallet. Thanks for the replies!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ken
@tipsysquid
block list per client aligns with my mental model. synchronization seems like the solution
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kieran Daniels
@kdaniels.eth
It has to work like this with Farcaster. This will be a major issue if it isn’t implemented before new users come. I’ve already totally stopped using CB wallet now and I was using it everyday for a few days.
1 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
ken
@tipsysquid
has to is strong. youre thinking that the social graph is supposed to be continuous across apps. by design I dont believe it is. block list should be synced, but it raises the question of who owns it. if it isnt standardized it'll give fc clients an edge over farcaster og client since it'll be disadvantaged against the universe of other apps
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Kieran Daniels
@kdaniels.eth
It has to be per client That’s how it works It could never “mirror” that would mean every client ever talks to each other and has the same block list
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ken
@tipsysquid
then I dont know what youre asking for 🤔 its not that they have to "sync", but it could be standardized to store the block list on chain in that the user owns the block list.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
