Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

kazani.base.eth 🦂 pfp
kazani.base.eth 🦂
@kazani.eth
I want to clarify my earlier post. My intention was to point out an observed pattern in the Farcaster Rewards, not to attack or demean anyone, especially not women. I value all creators and believe everyone deserves recognition for meaningful content. Being labeled a misogynist is deeply upsetting, as it misrepresents my views. Really hurts; it's the opposite of who I am or what I stand for. I've always supported equality and diversity in all spaces. To the reply saying “hot women” drive the economy, while I get the joke, it misses my point and leans into stereotypes I wasn't going for. Also, seeing some quick judgments and harsh comments from a few women based on one post felt unfair. It's tough when a single observation gets spun into something it's not. I know that's not the whole community, though. My goal was to spark a discussion about rewarding diverse, high-quality content from all creators, especially smaller accounts with valuable insights. Let's keep the conversation constructive and inclusive.
15 replies
1 recast
32 reactions

Linda Xie pfp
Linda Xie
@linda
my constructive feedback is it doesn't come across as you "value all creators" when you say "with no real content, value or inspiration" so i think it's fair people push back https://farcaster.xyz/linda/0x7d828cde
4 replies
1 recast
39 reactions

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
You probably need to follow more than 121 accounts to reduce the chance you share a myopic take about the network.
4 replies
2 recasts
18 reactions

Ivy pfp
Ivy
@ivy
lol sorry your feelings got hurt bro maybe next time think about impact over intent
0 reply
2 recasts
4 reactions

Frankie Styles pfp
Frankie Styles
@frankiestyles
You can’t value all creators and then say how someone decided to create their content not real content….
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Marwan ♋️ pfp
Marwan ♋️
@marwan1337
Replying to bring a little more awareness to meaningful discourse outside of hollow attacks from others who jump to conclusions.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Jarrett pfp
Jarrett
@jarrettr
People are rightfully going to assume you’re making a value judgement on people with the way it was worded It’s become way to common for people to be “noticers” and act neutral when their intention is to be negative about groups of people Your rewards this week are gonna be killer though lol
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Patricia Lee pfp
Patricia Lee
@patriciaxlee.eth
Did you delete the earlier post? Can’t find what you’re referring to.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Nick T pfp
Nick T
@nt
I feel like the authenticity of this take would be easier to believe if your original post was: "I find the leaderboard content while popular to not be interesting to me" vs. what you actually said, which condenses to: "Most of the top leaderboard content is made by women, and it isn't valuable, inspiring, or real. Do you agree with my observation?"
1 reply
1 recast
6 reactions

jac pfp
jac
@aphextwin
you are in the top 10 now at least lol
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

jessyfries pfp
jessyfries
@jessyjeanne
work harder
1 reply
1 recast
12 reactions

Breadsticks pfp
Breadsticks
@breadsticks.eth
You are not the victim, you were not constructive and inclusive. That being said, your content is extremely average to a niche group of developers, and to the greater crypto native, your content is boring.
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

cari ann shim sham* pfp
cari ann shim sham*
@cariannshimsham
patriarchy
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Plutox pfp
Plutox
@plutoxofweb3
wow
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction