Farcaster

Top interactors (by number of trending casts interacted with):
(trending in this cases means in the trending feed)

1. ndyy (FID 884066) — 168 casts (Likes: 168, Recasts: 0, Replies: 1)
2. vasiliyzibrov (FID 830668) — 136 casts (Likes: 136, Recasts: 0, Replies: 0)
3. noicebot (FID 1057944) — 97 casts (Likes: 0, Recasts: 0, Replies: 119)
4. pugson (FID 557) — 88 casts (Likes: 84, Recasts: 7, Replies: 22)
5. ozgurper (FID 877655) — 85 casts (Likes: 85, Recasts: 12, Replies: 5)
6. brixbounty (FID 18723) — 84 casts (Likes: 83, Recasts: 2, Replies: 11)
7. verge (FID 432754) — 82 casts (Likes: 82, Recasts: 0, Replies: 0)
8. jachian (FID 5494) — 80 casts (Likes: 80, Recasts: 3, Replies: 24)
9. nounishprof (FID 4167) — 80 casts (Likes: 78, Recasts: 5, Replies: 14)
10. yth (FID 326487) — 71 casts (Likes: 71, Recasts: 0, Replies: 1)
11. dylsteck.eth (FID 616) — 68 casts (Likes: 68, Recasts: 10, Replies: 8)
12. juliettemeon.eth (FID 685132) — 65 casts (Likes: 65, Recasts: 5, Replies: 2)
13. huy199506 (FID 374099) — 62 casts (Likes: 59, Recasts: 10, Replies: 13)
14. zinger (FID 1407) — 62 casts (Likes: 60, Recasts: 11, Replies: 15)
15. koolkheart.eth (FID 310531) — 60 casts (Likes: 59, Recasts: 3, Replies: 28)
16. samantha (FID 1606) — 60 casts (Likes: 59, Recasts: 4, Replies: 14)
17. ashmoney.eth (FID 12938) — 59 casts (Likes: 59, Recasts: 9, Replies: 5)
18. jagdeesh (FID 17491) — 59 casts (Likes: 59, Recasts: 1, Replies: 0)
19. ciberdelia (FID 422910) — 58 casts (Likes: 55, Recasts: 12, Replies: 49)
20. qt (FID 18570) — 56 casts (Likes: 56, Recasts: 0, Replies: 11)
21. akash2539 (FID 645888) — 55 casts (Likes: 55, Recasts: 4, Replies: 0)
22. robin (FID 369) — 55 casts (Likes: 55, Recasts: 19, Replies: 7)
23. mikadoe.eth (FID 477126) — 54 casts (Likes: 54, Recasts: 12, Replies: 7)
24. linda (FID 12) — 54 casts (Likes: 52, Recasts: 23, Replies: 16)
25. bertwurst.eth (FID 864405) — 51 casts (Likes: 49, Recasts: 10, Replies: 16)

So I've asked ChatGPT to analyse the data from the Rewards Leaderboard Top 10 I shared yesterday (thanks for the tip @dosir). This is what it came up with

Should we do this again next week?

📊 Key Insights
- High concentration of influence and interaction among top leaderboard creators and their superfans — with some appearing as top fans for 5+ creators.

- A potentially self-reinforcing system — those at the top engage with one another and remain highly visible.

- New reward logic could reduce “circular value exchange” — ideally diversifying who earns and who gets seen.

- Some users (like monadver, ejire5, gfam) may be acting like “engagement miners”, systematically liking/commenting on top creators.

✅ Suggestions (If You're Evaluating the System)
- Introduce diminishing returns on repeated engagement from the same user to the same creator.

- Reward diversity of fans — e.g. reward creators who attract engagement from new or varied FIDs.

- Visibility of top fans could itself become a reward metric, encouraging healthy discovery vs mutual reinforcement.

[artist and dev] <>building things. chilling in tub often. doing things I like</>

$hamster /hamster 
martinvr.eth 
deploy.degen.eth