Kalyan Singh

@kalyansingh

45 Following

3 Followers

Kalyan Singh pfp

OH: solvers are willing to do things for cheap , cause they do not have inventory risks. Give the solver an inventory & we have cheap market makers & a yield.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

send it to 0. TIA investors are really concerned about ethereum's future.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

sorry about the ens. his profile name is yannick[dot]eth. But not sure about who owns the ens.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

zach is not the guy you think he is . he takes deal from some pretty shady people. & is probably a part of coordinated attacks on coinbase & anyone linked to cb . Word is joe macanan is his sponsor rn . & joe hates cb & anyone linked to ethereum in any way. Check both their tweets, its obvious really. That's also why he don't comment on any memecoins, except the ones he's told to . Some less popular tracker (yannick.eth) even traced their wallets to some link , but at this point zach has a cult which wont listen to anyone.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

what's the use case? does it save me rpc compute units? or just for verifying that infura does not rug me?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

firefox. nothing comes close.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

maybe have some public registry backend (that's not paid like ens) . Wallets today give ids like .uni.eth, .cb.id resolvers but they are not compatible with each other. Its more of a human coordination problem then a code problem.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

what if it was @horsefacts.eth all along? & the 37 users on farcaster theory is true.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

Bharti Airtel. One of the biggest ISP in the world & particularly large in india . Has blocked all crypto block explorers. All etherscans are not opening through their SIM cards. https://internetfreedom.in/airtels-ai-driven-internet-filter-poses-censorship-risks/ Before any retarded larp tells you that ability to not being able to run a node is not important. Tell them to fuck off. Don't give me the sorry excuse of VPNs. If goverment wants they can make sure entire generations have not even heard the name of a VPN. Though its not a full blown attack on crypto & some websites are still working.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

how do you perform swaps?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

strikingly similar to silo's new version.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

well to be fair to the people who ask that. It was ur grandma & not you.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

But i guess that's the problem. maybe EF wants to make ethereum more centralized & more performant. If there's one guy who will probably not tolerate it that's peter. These are dangerous signs. & Cost cutting is a really bad excuse. I very much agree with Aya that EF should just go away ( the legendary subtractive mentality) .

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

had the feeling when peter went on sabbatical that its weird. Was recently watching one of justin drake's interviews or was it a protocol call . ( i think it was the 2nd ethproofs call) . Where he said the lines - "Goodbye geth. Hello zkReth". Geth is a god sent & no client currently comes close. 6 months ago . my full node was running geth on a 12 $ server bill / month. I tried running multiple clients on that cheap server, nothing worked. but geth? kept up with chain tip with 0 issues. 50-60% of the stakers who are using nethermind are using it cause people on ethereum's social layer bullied them into using it & not because it was a better product. That's not my opinion thats facts. So I do agree with peter that EF is using underhanded tactics against geth. Geth is the most cost optimized ethereum client. & has contributed to ethereum's decentralization more than any team.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

Why no institutional adoption you ask? You can today hide your balances through tornado or any other alternative but still so much to change. Running a node only cuts down 1 api provider. But what about all the price aggregator apis you are using to trade.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

L1 should maximally focus on confirmations & DA. Confirmations are useless with an expensive L1. Thats my stance.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

Dont like justin's answer. As far as I understand he's trying to say 3SF is still too slow. But preconfs are much newer & still rely on out of protocol actors. There is no guarantee that public goods preconfs sidecars will win over something more centralized. Reorg resistant preconfs are definetly interesting , but still too many unkowns & too long of a timeline. Preconfs are important to make the L1 fight for user accquisition among its L2s which is a loosing battle, uniswap foundation can tomorrow annouce 1 billon usd worth of liquidity mining incentive program to get users, EF cant.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

Matt rice correctly highlighted the solver rebalance problems. But he is severly underplaying 3SF's impact. Word of caution- across's revenue will take a hit if the L1 provides much faster finality. At the end of the day across makes money cause the L1 is not fast & cheap enough. Please talk to more people, solver teams are the people you want to talk to.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kalyan Singh pfp

hi so I listened to the talk . Big agree with dankrad. Currently all L2 - L2 rebalances are being captured by CEXs, maybe espresso will capture them, will depend on their tech & BD. which is really bad for L1. I also agree with his recent postings about user accquisition on L1. I think the L1s main role should be providing confirmations. Its gonna be much easier to just do 3SF & 2-3x gas limit increase & make sure that L2 - L2 rebalances go through the L1. Then to compete with coinbase for user accquisition for eternity.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction