gmuriok

@kakarotand

1534 Following

180 Followers

gmuriok pfp

https://x.com/gmuriok/status/1946179889708646539?t=xfuY3K_iSlXDYaxKR1fFGA&s=19

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gmuriok pfp

https://farcaster.xyz/onefootballclub/0xd0e8af9f

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

OneFootball Club pfp

OneFootball Club

@onefootballclub

OneFootball Club x CoinList 🤝 We are excited to announce one of the most community-favourable token sales ever: $OFC. ✨ Sale Details: https://coinlist.co/onefootball ✨ Sale FDV: $50M (same as stakeholders) Mark your calendar: 👉 July 24th 👈

396 replies

7462 recasts

7780 reactions

gmuriok pfp

https://x.com/gmuriok/status/1945813802106122388?t=1XMuFJp3urIQG4D4pEktFQ&s=19

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gmuriok pfp

https://x.com/gmuriok/status/1945488272769130496?t=Zi22rpvXjkCa3Pb6ChdOng&s=19

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

gmuriok pfp

https://x.com/gmuriok/status/1945161149256757597?t=_ha1zprIIcGe0uuNNPxIaw&s=19

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gmuriok pfp

https://x.com/gmuriok/status/1944859750258397307?t=y4y_BQO_9LyT8ocBlGysLw&s=19

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gmuriok pfp

Shock marketing is a strategy that uses deliberately shocking or controversial content to attract attention and create a strong emotional impact. Its effectiveness stems from: Breaking through ad saturation with unexpected content Increasing recall rates due to emotional shock Organic spread via user engagement Technical warning: Risk of the Boomerang Effect if it crosses cultural boundaries May damage long-term reputation despite short-term effectiveness Requires careful audience analysis before implementation Modern algorithms may automatically reduce the reach of shocking content, increasing campaign costs.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

gmuriok pfp

https://x.com/gmuriok/status/1942985107616227552?t=HpFVx5rLq0VwoKuWhwQQJQ&s=19

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

gmuriok pfp

https://x.com/gmuriok/status/1943758113078968440?t=VxlQTtwYfi-fwg9QfNkHKg&s=19

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

gmuriok pfp

https://x.com/gmuriok/status/1942985107616227552?t=cyhkJq155XUpBL8zZIuELA&s=19

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

gmuriok pfp

https://x.com/gmuriok/status/1942985107616227552?t=c--FEbVBKRNfxjACD9k2DQ&s=19

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gmuriok pfp

https://x.com/gmuriok/status/1942632623123362149?t=TEm8lx3qPE5wFZ_QjDkoSg&s=19

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gmuriok pfp

https://x.com/gmuriok/status/1942303730982084846?t=Bquav4qQjEX_ZLT82NKpFQ&s=19

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gmuriok pfp

https://x.com/gmuriok/status/1941869742219813044?t=hVIdU_rSxj_415JyZIQGIg&s=19

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gmuriok pfp

The biggest flaw to avoid in the EU blockchain voting experiment is weak cybersecurity for the following reasons: - Any security vulnerability could lead to irreversible fraud (exploiting vulnerabilities in smart contracts or the consensus protocol). - Voting requires secrecy, non-repudiation, and transparency. - Vulnerabilities could expose voter identities (breaking secrecy) or allow votes to be altered (breaching integrity). - A single breach could destroy confidence in an entire democracy, especially in a multicultural entity like the EU. - Sophisticated attacks such as APTs (advanced persistent threats) from state actors or actors. - Exploiting flaws in system design (such as reentry attacks). Why is it a top priority? Elections are a critical political infrastructure, and security flaws here mean not only financial loss but also a threat to social stability. Past experience has shown that security concerns are a major reason for not scaling up. Proposed solution: Adopt a hybrid approach (paper records + blockchain for auditing), with independent security audits and extensive penetration testing before any large-scale deployment. Security should be a cornerstone, not just an added benefit.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gmuriok pfp

https://x.com/kakarotand/status/1941084481030393976?t=LcAkllv8rs2nmu9vAvhoLw&s=19

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gmuriok pfp

https://x.com/kakarotand/status/1940763123343868285?t=nusENriAH8JtaNsv8vy07A&s=19

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gmuriok pfp

The storage feature is an excellent step to attract investors, but can the Solana Fund attract significant liquidity due to this feature? I'll explain how the fund works, and let you decide: - The trading and storage commission is 1.5%, which is considered a significant figure in the world of ETFs. - The fund stores only 50% of the asset size. The average (ideal) storage return on the Solana network could reach 8% annually (more or less depending on the network's performance). Since the fund stores half the amount in addition to the commission deducted by the fund, the annual interest on storing Solana within the ETF could reach 2.1% (or slightly more, depending on variable factors related to storage and documentation on the Solana network). Examples in numbers: An investment of $1 million yields annual returns of approximately $21,000. An investment of $10 million yields annual returns of approximately $210,000. An investment of $100 million yields annual returns of approximately $2.1 million. Meanwhile, direct storage on the Solana network yields returns many times the above figures. If we look at these figures through the lens of financial market investors who trade millions of dollars daily, are these figures attractive? Especially since the assets must remain in the fund to generate these profits.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gmuriok pfp

The US Senate passes the controversial "One Big Beautiful Bill."

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction