Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/politics
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
One of my more radical beliefs is that many more classes of governance actions should be anonymous / secret ballot (eg. I've advocated for secret-ballot UN general assembly votes before) This situation is a good argument for judges' identities being hidden (!!) when they make their rulings. The function of a judge is to rule according to the facts as interpreted through their conscience, not to be "accountable" to violent mobs.
38 replies
84 recasts
583 reactions

Agost Biro pfp
Agost Biro
@agostbiro
The issue here is not that judges are doxxed. In fact that's healthy in a well-functioning society, because it lets them take part in public life to represent their institution. This attack is a symptom of state capture in the US that won't be solved by anon voting.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Judges should be doxxed, I'm saying their individual decisions should not be.
3 replies
1 recast
5 reactions

J. Valeska 🦊🎩🫂 pfp
J. Valeska 🦊🎩🫂
@jvaleska.eth
this makes even less sense for me why doxx then and hide decisions.. then others judges may have affected by decisions done by a corrupt one best way to fix is. Not having guns in the supermarket and not educate society in violence but I guess it is late and current presibuffoon asking for violent acts every day from social media is part of the problem have you seen spain protests again genocide? people can protest without burning the parlament or assaulting the capitol and force decisions the US are not a valid example for sane democracies or exemplar behaviours.. to be honest.. the internal problems they got there are different in other places.. judges are part of the problem of corruption most of the time.. and one attack to a judge house must be judged with all the weight of the law, that's all what did they do to hackers to give example? jail them in guantanamo with all the corrupt judges, ofc
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction