Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
jordanᵀᴺ
@jordanisgreen.eth
If "top priority is grow users on the protocol" and the original naming strategy is "extremely confusing for new users", it feels like a swing and a miss to view developer feedback as more important than the advice you could get from people who regularly work on challenges such as: adoption, onboarding, retention, etc. Creating a name that can scale, and a brand that is magnetic isn't some fluffy soft skill. It's work that deserve's to be taken seriously, and skipping that step causes ALL kinds of problems in the future (the problems that the developers are being asked to weigh in on, actually).
1 reply
2 recasts
14 reactions
jordanᵀᴺ
@jordanisgreen.eth
I, for one, have heard from a lot of the people I talk to or interview that web3 feels "really abstract". "Farcast" may have a lot of brand equity from the existing users, but does it mean anything to someone brand new? And how much does that matter? What exactly is it about "Farcast" that people love? Could this be an opportunity to consider what a more open source brand looks like, starting with the name? WDYT Design Cabal?
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
