₊‧°𐐪♡𐑂°‧₊ writing about digital art & curating things 
₊‧°𐐪♡𐑂°‧₊ Artistic Manager @ Artpoint.
Building /lanparty 💾 Hosting /curation ✨

Web3 platforms will eventually have billions of users, but these platforms will not look like tumblr or ig. If your roadmap is a (25 cent) social media platform you are ngmi. To answer the question, post whatever you want. People will only buy it if they feel you have enough rights (no one buys copyminted work etc). Ideally in the specific case the gallery/museum would negotiate rights with artists and post official versions which could be collected, but most trad art orgs are probably 10+ years away from embracing these ideas. Influencers have generally been replaced by artists/builders etc. No one wants the unofficial social media post of the artwork, they want the artwork (directly) 💫

There's legality, but enforcement is often where you should focus. Many things are illegal, but can't be enforced. Most Web 2.0 content is financially worthless, snapshots, etc, no one pay will for it. I'm sure rights issues will come up occasionally, but if someone has found a new way to substantially monetize, there should be enough to go around for all to be happy. The museum, patron, curator, collector, artist, viewer, sharer, critic, historian, etc can all add value. How do you create systems that fairly reward all providing value?