Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Our priorities this week 1. Fix biggest user-reported paint points â bugs, video, spam labels 2. Make onboarding easier â bug fixes and early work on a new invite / referral system 3. Improve wallet â swap and NFT reliability 4. Improve miniapps â manifest tool, domain changes, better discovery, better docs 5. Starting work on a new idea (will take some time)
38 replies
54 recasts
382 reactions
jd đș
@jdl
where are channels migrating to the proto
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Holding pattern. No clear consensus on what channel owners are willing to trade off.
1 reply
0 recast
9 reactions
agusti
@bleu.eth
What would be the options? tbh feels like channels had potential but was never fully realized. I understand how it's not a great lever for growth ROI so far, so makes sense to not -waste- time on it unless a clear goal on what to i guess..
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
A few things offered (each one helps reduce complexity and easier to move into the protocol sooner): 1. Reduce surface area for channels in Farcaster app, e.g. no channels profile page 2. No namespace, e.g. /ai moves to a link (similar to Discord) 3. Primary way to manage and interact with channels is in channel-specific app like Cura 4. Channels are narrowcast -- you only see channel content from channels you follow
2 replies
2 recasts
5 reactions
jd đș
@jdl
what more can you say about 2 and 4
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
2) Namespace will end up squatted and people more frusturated than they are today. What do you do with an abandoned channel like /ai ? 4) People want communities but also growth / distribution. If you want a community hard to let other new people post in your channel since it will most likely not be high quality to start.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions