
jbi
@jbi

It is nice to see a muscular response from people regarding Ethereum's technical identity as (rollup-centric) Roadmap and the implied Endgame. However, it does elide a little how Ethereum's social identity is and always has been somewhat ambiguous, which has not affected its position, which speaks for itself in marketcap and influence. But I do believe there is some truth to the 'identity crisis' there. Nobody can quite agree on a North Star for Ethereum, there is no Social Road Map and people fear even embedding one because they feel it would essentially be cultural centralisation. But I am somewhat concerned about it, about the question mark over what Ethereum is supposed to be, socially. Because on one hand it means we have multiple spinning narratives, none of which has widespread traction, which invites internal conflict and there be dragons (know your blockchain history). On the other, nature abhors a vacuum and if we don't fill it, someone else might, finding ourselves on the edge of our own territory. 0 reply
20 recasts
41 reactions
9 replies
7 recasts
17 reactions
21 replies
77 recasts
277 reactions
5 replies
8 recasts
14 reactions
8 replies
19 recasts
117 reactions
1 reply
11 recasts
21 reactions
7 replies
6 recasts
16 reactions
3 replies
4 recasts
8 reactions
35 replies
25 recasts
209 reactions
7 replies
5 recasts
15 reactions
1 reply
6 recasts
12 reactions
15 replies
34 recasts
146 reactions
6 replies
47 recasts
166 reactions
1 reply
6 recasts
19 reactions
29 replies
10 recasts
49 reactions
60 replies
23 recasts
126 reactions
13 replies
11 recasts
36 reactions
2 replies
8 recasts
20 reactions
0 reply
2 recasts
2 reactions
22 replies
19 recasts
120 reactions