Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

sebayaki.eth pfp
sebayaki.eth
@if
🧵 AMM vs Bonding Curve — Why Bonding Curves are underrated for serious token projects, As the founder of Mint Club, let me explain why bonding curves may be the missing primitive for sustainable token models — especially for long-term aligned projects. 1️⃣ First, let’s understand the core difference: • AMM = Floating liquidity • Bonding Curve = Fixed liquidity logic In AMM (Uniswap, Aerodrome, etc.), liquidity depends on LPs adding/removing funds. In Bonding Curve, liquidity is baked into the price curve from day one. No LPs needed. 👇
9 replies
5 recasts
27 reactions

sebayaki.eth pfp
sebayaki.eth
@if
2️⃣ AMM is great for meme coins & short-term hype Because liquidity in AMMs can freely move based on demand, they fit speculative tokens, fast trading, and meme cycles. But serious builders know: Volatile liquidity = fragile ecosystems. 3️⃣ Bonding Curves = locked liquidity = trust layer In bonding curves, liquidity can’t be pulled. The only way liquidity exits is via burns — meaning every buy increases locked capital, every sell reduces supply. This creates long-term price integrity.
2 replies
2 recasts
10 reactions

sebayaki.eth pfp
sebayaki.eth
@if
4️⃣ Now here’s where it gets interesting for founders 👀 Let’s say you’re launching a side project or new product under your main community. You have 2 options: A) Create a totally new token B) Launch a child token using bonding curves backed by your main token 5️⃣ Case study: Mint Club’s MT token • MT is backed by HUNT (parent token). • To fully mint all MT tokens, ~50% of HUNT total supply must be locked. Every MT minted permanently locks HUNT into the curve, strengthening both ecosystems.
2 replies
1 recast
4 reactions

ArtStudio48 pfp
ArtStudio48
@artstudio48
Bonding curves are works of art, and I am glad to have discovered them awhile back 🤙
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction