Hugh Naylor
@hughnaylor
There’s this expectation now that Iran will double down on developing a nuclear weapons program. But such a program is extremely costly, both economically and politically. Yet its sophisticated missile arsenal proved extremely effective in its war with Israel. A tremendous amount of damage was inflicted — the extent of which is not fully accounted for, in part because of Israel’s military censorship. It does seem that doubling down on the missile program — with emphasis on hypersonic missiles — would be more cost effective and in turn would provide the necessary force to deter both Israel and US forces in the region. Almost think not pursuing nukes would be more effective were the missile program ramped up instead
3 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
FrameTheGlobe
@frametheglobe
“We consider the use of such weapons as haraam, and believe that it is everyone’s duty to make efforts to secure humanity against this great disaster.” — Ayatollah Khamenei
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Catch0x22
@catch0x22.eth
just my opinion, but i think strategically there's better weapons than nukes nowadays. nukes are for show
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
HH
@hamud
Whats your main job btw?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction