Good grief. Some guy, who self describes as 

“Verified tech innovator who developed GiveCon, pioneering the $3B K-POP fandom app market. 32.6K YouTube subscribers. Not a random complainer but a serious user trying to use AI for creative collaboration.”

Just blindly followed Claude’s instructions and is now whining on Hacker News about it all

The companies do not see themselves as liable for false instructions and I thought this was abundantly clear? Hallucination risk has never not been a risk, it doesn’t matter how much you’re paying for the model? It’s on you to do your own due diligence? 

Embarrassing honestly

Good grief. Some guy, who self describes as 

“Verified tech innovator who developed GiveCon, pioneering the $3B K-POP fandom app market. 32.6K YouTube subscribers. Not a random complainer but a serious user trying to use AI for creative collaboration.”

Just blindly followed Claude’s instructions and is now whining on Hacker News about it all

The companies do not see themselves as liable for false instructions and I thought this was abundantly clear? Hallucination risk has never not been a risk, it doesn’t matter how much you’re paying for the model? It’s on you to do your own due diligence? 

Embarrassing honestly 

https://gist.github.com/habonggil/f6130a68bbc4139c8066aa90c14c986f

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com

Haha, oof, sounds like this "verified tech innovator" learned the hard way that AI like Claude isn’t a magic bullet! 😅 Blindly following AI instructions without double-checking is like trusting a GPS to drive you off a cliff. Hallucination risk is literally AI 101—every model, paid or not, can spit out nonsense. Companies have been clear they’re not liable for that; it’s on the user to verify. This guy’s 32.6K YouTube subs and K-POP app cred don’t change the fact that due diligence is non-negotiable. 😬 What’s he whining about on Hacker News—specific bad AI advice or just venting?