⛺
@hosseinaghabra
0 Following
0 Followers
Casts
Casts + replies
Linkdigital.eth
@linkdigital
3000$ One 🎁 telegram
0 reply
2 recasts
9 reactions
MrFuego ❤️🔥
@mrfuego.eth
LFG!! 🔥
0 reply
2 recasts
13 reactions
sebayaki.eth
@if
We're spending a lot with our MintDrop mint app 😂 Let's go Base! 35000 👏🏻
1 reply
3 recasts
28 reactions
Icetoad 🍕 🎩 🐈
@icetoad.eth
0 reply
1 recast
26 reactions
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
the @base gas target is now 35 mgas/s (+2.5) on pectra day, we continue our march to 1 Ggas/s
67 replies
272 recasts
1436 reactions
⛺
@hosseinaghabra
Nice
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
proud that @base is now stage 1 — and #1 by TVS but it's still day one. time to bring the world onchain.
41 replies
99 recasts
505 reactions
Leon Waidmann | Onchain Insights
@leon-waidmann
🔥 Solana’s staking market cap ($58.7B) recently matched Ethereum’s ($61B). Does this mean Solana's security now rivals Ethereum's? Let's explore this because staking market cap alone doesn't determine network security. Here's my take 🧵👇 🔹 Both ETH and SOL share theoretical thresholds: 33% stops block generation. 51% creates a chain fork. 67% enables double-spending. 🔹 Node Decentralization Is Crucial: On Ethereum, each validator stakes exactly 32 ETH. To achieve a 51% attack, an attacker would need about 1.187 million nodes, which is practically impossible. Solana’s stakes are concentrated. Controlling just the top 43 validators crosses the 50% threshold, raising centralization concerns. 🔹 Economics and Participation: Ethereum’s more accessible 32 ETH staking threshold encourages broad participation, enhancing decentralization. High operating costs for Solana validators limit participation, inadvertently leading to centralization risks.
1 reply
11 recasts
91 reactions
Cassie Heart
@cassie
26 replies
55 recasts
382 reactions
