Interesting take away that, for some reason, was not inherent to me (and was mentioned in a few panels in different ways) is that federal regulation should *not* focus on specific tools like blockchain or ai, but rather their outcomes

Ex:
1. If someone uses ai to maliciously access to your funds, there are already laws that state it is illegal to steal. Whether or not ai was used is irrelevant on the outcome that already has regulatory ramifications. 
2. Discussing shared ownership on blockchain, the argument was that legal structures for co-ops already exist, it does not need to be redefined for blockchain (it was stated more elegantly than this, but I digress)

I think I considered the opposite for a while, that each of these tools would require their own regulatory frameworks to an extent, but I appreciated hearing the experts expand my mental model on how to consider how things may play out in our ecosystem from a regulatory standpoint