gm Farcaster Pro Max Ultra users 

We've been doing a lot of work on how to make the Sub Account + Spend Permission pitch to users clearly and succinctly when they're connecting to apps. 

What do you think of this?

I would just say “allow this app to spend up to $10 or .0001 ETGa day”

Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

This is what we say for pure spend limit request. For sub account I think this is missing the “why would I want this/what does this get me?”

I’d even skip the transaction confirmation bit: “what’s a transaction confirmation?”

Just “allow x to use up to $10 of my balance daily (you can always revoke this later”

Data privacy on the web. Keeper of the fabric @privy.

Fmr Protocol Labs consensus work. Before that YC S14 🇫🇷🌐🍊

My take is it’s broadly going to be contextual, ie up to the app to clarify that context. The wallet trying to do that will be too clunky.

Thank you! 

But if you’re a user connecting to an app, why would you want to do that? Does the user need some “this is going to give you a faster and smoother UX” motivation?