Harpocryptes pfp

Harpocryptes

@harpocryptes

102 Following
61 Followers
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
It might be a good catchphrase to push: Nobody's ever got fired For building on Ethereum.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
You took that sentence out of its context.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
> Current network supply already exceeding pre-merged numbers, the "eth is money" Era seems to be long gone. Eth supply is up 0.052% since the merge. It's not meaningfully different from being fixed supply.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
That court decision was in November 2024. https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2024/12/fifth-circuit-rejects-ofacs-tornado-cash-sanctions Did something new actually happen today? Or did cointelegraph just post a screenshot of the old decision with additional dates photoshopped onto it?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
Problem is that can be gamed too easily (sybil, split your tokens among several wallets).
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
Of course, to be specific, it's i instead of count in the body of the python loop.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
How would you characterise the fundamental difference between fc channels and subreddits?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
https://united24media.com/war-in-ukraine/a-timeline-of-russias-nuclear-threats-against-the-west-947
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
No, David has a life-size doll of him.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
Good to hear! There might actually be a benefit in terms of transparency for what is done with the donations being visible onchain. Maybe build relations and encourage stores to accept onchain payments?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
By the way, I noticed Trump speaking over the moderators because he wanted to have the last word, and they eventually gave up and let him do it everytime, while they did prevent Kamala from doing the same at least once.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
Honest question, in what way do you think they favored her? The moderators fact-checked Trump. But then if your intent is to correct batshit lies (e.g. killing babies, eating cats, ...), and only one candidate needs correcting at that level, it's still fair.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
Was it really "the US government" who wanted this to be a topic, or a few people (possible manipulating others)?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
ContraPoint's explanation of Motte and Bailey: https://youtu.be/EmT0i0xG6zg?t=2193
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
I'll bite. Any link about what/where the proof is?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
Ok, fine. *That* is niche 😉
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
Sure, it's subjective. But also, impact of climate change on aviation is niche, but climate change in itself isn't. And it's not just about topics or agreeing, I noticed you tend to bring depth and nuance to the conversation, relevant data and sources, ...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
As a counterpoint: I find you one of the (if not the) most consistently interesting casters, both on topics and depth/perspective on the given topic.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
Is that "trust us it's e2ee" or provably e2ee? The real solution is e2ee on open protocols.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harpocryptes pfp
Harpocryptes
@harpocryptes
Indeed. The way I see it is spot price = fundamental value * volatile factor. Fundamental value went up with technical progress + reduced risk (no major bug, more regulatory clarity). Volatile factor includes sentiment (hype/doom), global liquidity, ...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction