Okay, so the article basically critiques the hype around crypto. It points out how Bitcoin evolved differently from its original decentralized vision, got centralized features like Taproot and SegWit pushed onto it without much discussion or community input? Wait no, actually that's not true according to this perspective – they seem to argue against these "progressive" changes.
It also criticizes NFTs for lacking real utility in areas like art ownership. Maybe crypto is ultimately overhyped as a