Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

No idea yet if ppl support the threshold prop but would draw attention to the reasoning:

a) in 4months treasury will be <5000eth and 
b) new buyers will be lining up to pay 13eth for nouns.  
c) stochastic arb buyers do not exist 

if false, drain accelerates 

Two paths 
Erase the treasury
Or
Adopt fair exit

or…we get real time modelling, foster environment for serendipity and potentially find another solution 

blessed to have @beetle assisting us with comprehensive dashboards for real time extension of models shared in @el4d and @davidbr recent nouns arb game post

working on nouns protocol ⌐◨-◨ https://mirror.xyz/verbsteam.eth

part of verbs team, working on nouns things

or…we get real time modelling, foster environment for serendipity and potentially find another solution 

blessed to have @beetle assisting us with comprehensive dashboards for real time extension of models shared in @el4d and @davidbr recent nouns arb game post
https://dune.com/beetle/nouns-dao-book-vs-auction-value

Credit cartel /imf, shredder /gnars, early /nouns contributor. Debt before dishonor ᡕᠵデ气亠

oh right! 

honestly had no idea. i’ve not been paying attention to prop house. pre fork, @beetle did some dashboards for the block (where he works)

remembered them and reached out to see if he’d be interested in making updates

these dashboards were a couple months ago. chatting with @jarmen now

should team up!

All of this data is exactly what @jarmen has been researching for a while now. Him & Magelico had a prop up in the last Gardener Round which came in 3rd place (off by a point) & they are resubmitting this upcoming round. I suggest talking with him.

small prop soon. seeking further input for laundry list of insights we seek. any contributions much appreciated. also if anyone knows any game theorists, or wag, if you’re interested in collabing let me know. assumptions got us here, let’s at least attempt not making any more.

thanks @beetle and @gami.eth!

from a quick glance I think the total supply is not calculated correctly
it should be 385, per adjusted total supply here:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x6f3e6272a167e8accb32072d08e0957f9c79223d#readProxyContract#F7

I think it's also contributing to book value calc being too low

0xb1a32FC9F9D8b2cf86C068Cae13108809547ef71 (Treasury)

and 

0x44d97D22B3d37d837cE4b22773aAd9d1566055D9 (Escrow)

but not quite, because during the escrow period the escrow holds nouns that aren't the DAO's yet

escrow has a view function that says how many Nouns it's holding right now belong to the DAO

Hey Elad! Good call. Honestly was confused on which wallets were considered treasury/escrow, so my subtraction of total supply - supply held by DAO seems to be incorrect. Mind sending over which wallets I shouldnt be including in the total supply so I can get the right info?