Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/arrow
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Frey tradesđŸŽ©đŸ“ˆ pfp
Frey tradesđŸŽ©đŸ“ˆ
@freymon.eth
Hey @naaate, Been following along and just wanted to say—this all feels really good. The direction you’re taking with Arrowheads stands out in a space that often feels loud and performative. There’s a calm confidence in this approach that I really appreciate. so i’ll try to do this in a critic—suggestion type of way first would be the mini-app/product direction 1. Progress Verification: Consider modular proof-of-progress tools (e.g., screenshots, Figma links, GitHub commits) built into update posts. This doesn’t need to be trustless—just structured enough to make updates feel concrete and legible to backers. 2. Community-as-co-builder: Allow projects to embed calls for help (e.g., need a designer, need meme support) right in their updates. This turns the dashboard into more than a tracker—it becomes a public workshop
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Frey tradesđŸŽ©đŸ“ˆ pfp
Frey tradesđŸŽ©đŸ“ˆ
@freymon.eth
Cohort Structure + Weekly ETH Pools: Weekly ETH rewards are a great nudge, but over time, there’s a risk of updates being posted just to check a box. A few creators might treat it like a chore. You might eventually need some way to keep the bar high without making it feel competitive or stressful—maybe light curation, or occasional themed prompts (“what did you almost give up on this week?”). Optional Transparency Mode: Let creators opt into showing funding levels and deliverable timelines publicly on their dashboard. This creates an aura of accountability-through-pride, rather than shame. Governance + Curation Limiting the initial group makes a ton of sense. Maybe over time you can give each project a “slot” to vouch for a future builders. Consider on-chain “vouching” where each project in the founding cohort can “vouch” for 1 new entrant. This makes expansion a lil bit slow, but social, and gives early committed builders soft governance powers without full DAO overhead.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Frey tradesđŸŽ©đŸ“ˆ pfp
Frey tradesđŸŽ©đŸ“ˆ
@freymon.eth
Cohort Criteria this could use some clarity: i think “Serious creators” makes sense, but it’s also pretty open to interpretation. Some people might hesitate to apply because they don’t know if they qualify. Others might flood in thinking they do. Just a little more framing around what kind of energy or projects you’re looking for would help everyone feel more confident stepping in (or opting out). Culture – The culture feels good now because it’s small and personal, but that won’t stay automatic as more people show up. Might be worth thinking ahead about how to protect that—whether it’s rituals, onboarding, memes, weekly calls or twitter space talks or something else. Culture tends to slip when no one’s holding it directly.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction