franco pfp
franco
@francos.eth
I wonder if you could recast cryptography in categorical language: Instead of “groups, rings and fields + probabilistic Turing machines”, you work with objects that stand for resources (channels, keys, random beacons, OT-boxes, etc.) and morphisms that stand for protocols transforming those resources.
4 replies
1 recast
10 reactions

franco pfp
franco
@francos.eth
Some papers I found (haven't read and probably goes way over my head): - Categorical Composable Cryptography: https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.05949 - Abstract / Constructive Cryptography: https://crypto.ethz.ch/publications/files/MauRen11.pdf
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction