Should I Pseudonym? pfp

Should I Pseudonym?

@fong888.eth

140 Following
63 Followers


Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
After multiple conversations with web3 that are going in on marketing but don't think about product GTM....decided to capture some thinking on this blindspot.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
Is the goal of Warpcast to write great content and it will get discovered? Or build a community like on Reddit and just "hope" people come?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
web3 doesn't change the physics, the first principles, we saw in web2. It doesn't mean tossing out all the principles. What it does it unleashes a new set of physics that overlays on prior incentives and mechanisms. Whether it actually is "good" or "utopic" depends on the application.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
Being a Product Manager is, at its core, leadership and drive. Being a PM when Product Leadership lacks leadership is painful. No one likes a leadership vacuum. Because vacuums suck. The superpower is leading your leader as a follower.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
blockchain / crypto powered public transportation to augment and then someday replace SFMTA.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
Ideology is not a product, nor is it a product strategy, but in crypto, some segments believe ideology drives everything. Ideals, point of view...those certainly contribute and are different from blind ideology. I think we're seeing a lifting of the veil in the past month globally to be more clear-eyed on providing value.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
Yep, that's what I meant by a token "fueling itself" -- utility, productive reflexivity -- it is in fact part of the product itself.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
How did they own their distribution?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
"You know what happens when a company obsesses over customers and executes to satisfy them in every way possible? They become huge." Are there crypto companies that have this ethos? Worked with one which obsessed over token holders, and it's NGMI.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
If token is the product, narrative is the product not just marketing. To date, narrative is the pump and amplifier. But the narrative is just as important perhaps more important. The token then must be much more than attention-seeking. It has to embrace mechanisms to fuel itself.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
Which team is working on Stablecoin TVL @ccarella.eth and is this something that they could work with community on jointly? Been thinking about Stablecoins on Superchains.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
Now I don't know whether it's worth it to start a channel versus just writing.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
Talking about protocols sometimes is divorced from the token design. I've seen protocol conversations just about how the infra works. That seems to be missing the point.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
So little conversation about how web3 should change the nature of work, employment, organizations. DAOs was one idea and I don't think it's the end state, just the draft. But one thing remains clear: quality leadership >>>> poor leadership. web3 doesn't change human nature.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
Yep. Too soon.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
@binji -- I am studying OP in the context of studying and writing about protocols; at the protocol level, what are the distinct advantages OP vs other L2 (if it's due to optimistic consensus, are there trade-offs)? What's the next frontier of exploration in the protocol-level design space?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
Not sure this is a good sign....
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
Is this definitely bullish? I know it should stimulate more liquidity, but do we know whether M2 from bank lending, which is often influenced by the fed funds rate, is up or down? Market is bullish, but a 50 bps suggests the Fed is worried about something (other than inflation)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
Thanks for organizing at Zeitgeist. @matthew
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Should I Pseudonym? pfp
Should I Pseudonym?
@fong888.eth
IRL + Warpcast go together: @arob1000 @skyron.eth @flexasaurusrex
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction