so if every revenue stream is attached to a token, you could basically split that revenue stream proportionately to equity holders, and even make it so that users have equity (and therefore revenue streamed to them).

if users are producing revenue and don't have upside in the network, then why have a token

fairly trivial to also have multiple revenue streams attached to a single token, so you could have multiple products with their own tokens sharing revenue with the larger token.

imo more companies should experiment with this model to fund new experiments

building @dau and @boostxyz to help app devs grow onchain with tokens

model works best for creators who historically have lived off multiple rev streams from their content/audience. just need to bring offchain revenue, onchain.

I agree, which is why I don't think it will work for a venture-funded company in crypto

The biggest challenge is there are very few revenue streams in crypto that work and have scale.

farstore

4eth of $LAUNCHER
1eth of $CLANKER

Today we executed our first token buybacks with fees generated from the $TIPN launch.

The @farstore flywheel is spinning!

receipts: https://basescan.org/tx/0xae2840f82b160d4b6ef92f496d5f2be98dd87fcee4bc2702f2a7a47369acf31f

indeed. def think this is where the puck is going

we're dogfooding this approach with @tipn + @farstore

Turning likes into money since April 2025 | Created by @kompreni & @niftytime.eth | PFP by @ekaitza | CA: 0x5bA8d32579A4497c12D327289A103C3ad5b64eb1

Building @tipn @farstore @rebase | Advising /24art | Prev. @cent Nifty Gateway | Hosting /thewipmeetup | byteGAN #265 PFP by @vanarman

indeed. def think this is where the puck is going

we're dogfooding this approach with @tipn + @farstore 

https://farcaster.xyz/kompreni/0x40c4ede9