Ferran šŸ’ pfp
Ferran šŸ’
@ferran
The most revealing part of today is Musk essentially admitting that buying Twitter wasn’t about making it a better and more open social network, but rather about entrenching the status quo and amplifying an authoritarian, right-wing agenda. Today opens another opportunity for Farcaster to differentiate from X and Musk. Will probably not happen.
2 replies
2 recasts
17 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Differentiation doesn’t matter if there’s no market for it. No one still active on X cares enough to leave the network effect. If you care and you don’t like crypto, you’re on Bluesky. If you care and you like crypto, you’re here.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Ferran šŸ’ pfp
Ferran šŸ’
@ferran
Fair enough. Just to understand , what is the reasoning to put these values aside and boost other key differentiators like ā€œearn on Farcasterā€ or ā€œmake money on Farcasterā€ that are not at the core values of the protocol itself? Is your hypothesis that there’s a larger market for that? Is a new market or are you trying to capture it from somewhere else?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Consumers use things that solve problems for them. Those values only solve a problem for a very small % of people. That's saturated already between Mastodon, BlueSky, Nostr and Farcaster. Most people only use apps to be entertained or make money (either directly or indirectly through work).
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction