Top 25 earning creators (so far)

The only person I knew before starting Farcaster was @jessepollak 

something something status as a service creating new stars on a new social network proof of work something something

Landscape photography / AI art / gen art. building @toveskargard
/photographers /biohacking 

https://linktr.ee/joelleLB

It’s open to everyone. Algo is based on engagement.

Digital Media Producer. I like particles and waves too. I like art.

DepressiveHacks is an investor, contributor, consultant, and writer in the web3 space, operating under the umbrella of DHR&D and depressivehacks.com.

Talking of engagement, I’d love to chip in something. I feel like the Farcaster algorithm could use some improvement, particularly in ensuring fairness. Now I’m not saying it’s completely flawed, but one major issue I’ve noticed is the Trending Casts section.

Some casts that appear there don’t seem trending-worthy, while others, from highly consistent and talented creators like @depressivehacks @thedude and some other creators who I feel like they’ve been making banger casts (in my own opinion) never seem to make it to that section.

This raises the question: How does the algorithm determine which casts are “worthy” of trending and which ones aren’t? And if it’s strictly by engagements how does it pick it up ?

Embracing the Decentralized Revolution 🪙 | comfy in Leviathan-Free Low Volatility Money @pintodotmoney 🚜

Also believe @boldleonidas said something related to this in a now deleted cast before he went back off